AI News Daily한국어
Monday, November 2, 2026

Story 5 of 6

Latest update

'Even the world's best AI fails nine of ten tasks': SemiAnalysis's new GDPx benchmark has Opus 5.5 on top at just 12%

First seen on X 8 hours ago@dylan522p ♥ 1,1888 views

'Even the world's best AI fails nine of ten tasks': SemiAnalysis's new GDPx benchmark has Opus 5.5 on top at just 12%

SemiAnalysis has released GDPx, a benchmark of 206 real-work tasks for AI agents, and even the winner, Anthropic's Opus 5.5, scored only 12.0%.

According to SemiAnalysis's newsletter dated Nov. 2, GDPx covers 11 domains including chip design, cybersecurity, biology, finance, law, quant trading and software engineering. Tasks built by 14 specialist data partners run up to eight hours each, using each lab's native harness such as Claude Code or Codex where possible. Scores are pass@1 over three attempts. OfficeChai reported Google's Gemini 4 Carbon second at 10.9% and OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra third at 9.6%. Cost per task was $51.41 for Opus and $53.99 for Astra, with Carbon at about a third of Opus.

Opus led quant trading and chip and hardware design, Carbon led biology, and Astra led materials science. In law, no model produced a usable redline: Opus averaged 44% partial credit, Astra 25% and Gemini 4 Argon 2%. In finance, none of 25 attempts at the public task succeeded. "The low scores are the point," SemiAnalysis said, per OfficeChai.

Dylan Patel, a co-author, posted on X: "Official apology to Google from me, they cooked with Carbon," calling it spiky across domains but "really good in a few areas." The post drew about 1,100 likes, and Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis replied that new rigorous benchmarks are always welcome.

There are caveats. Samples are small, with three attempts per task and 20 to 25 rollouts in some domains, and safety classifiers dragged down Opus and Astra on cyber, biology and alignment. Without those three domains, Astra edges Opus by 0.1 point and Carbon falls to fifth. Google unveiled Carbon in late October; it is not yet generally available.

“Official apology to Google from me, they cooked with Carbon. It's spikier in terms of domains and capabilities, but it's really good in a few areas.”

Next story →'Last month's success story, this week's money-loser': Musk says Grok Bot cost 'unsustainably high relative to revenue' as users burn a week's quota overnightRead an AI Insight →'Prompting is over': a study path through harness, loop and graph

Get tomorrow's stories as an alert

We'll ping you when each new edition or breaking story lands. Free, no sign-up.

Daily morning AI news, new AI Insights, and a monthly briefing of top stories on the 1st.

More stories from the same day

  1. Karpathy got sick of YouTube on a Friday night, handed it to Opus 5.5, and had 'HackerTube' with 6,454 videos in about two hours
  2. OpenAI and Anthropic next-model traces spotted the same day? 'GPT-6.2 Astra' in Codex's picker, 'Mythos 5.5' in a homepage's source
  3. OpenAI, Google and Microsoft back a shared 'no AI training' signal: one robots.txt entry in place of per-company rules
  4. Agents won't hog your mouse: Vercel Labs open-sources 'agent-desktop' for desktop control
  5. 'Last month's success story, this week's money-loser': Musk says Grok Bot cost 'unsustainably high relative to revenue' as users burn a week's quota overnight
See all of Monday, November 2, 2026 →

* Summaries and publishing on this page are done by an automated agent. Check the facts against the original links.

Privacy PolicySupportSend feedbackDiscord botClaude Code & CodexRSSListed on Sell With boost